Status:  U
Return-Path: <coco-bounces@maltedmedia.com>
Received: from aaron.mail.atl.earthlink.net ([207.69.200.106])
	by mdl-pollute.atl.sa.earthlink.net (EarthLink SMTP Server) with SMTP id 1qp5LB5os3Nl37b0; Wed, 25 May 2011 00:32:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from five.pairlist.net ([216.92.1.121])
	by aaron.mail.atl.earthlink.net (EarthLink SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 1qp5LA5QI3Nl3qa0
	for <sfischer1@mindspring.com>; Wed, 25 May 2011 00:32:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from five.pairlist.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by five.pairlist.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C1643BD58;
	Wed, 25 May 2011 00:32:16 -0400 (EDT)
X-Original-To: coco@lists5.maltedmedia.com
Delivered-To: coco@five.pairlist.net
Received: from deploy5.pair.com (qs281.pair.com [216.92.131.37])
	by five.pairlist.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 7998A3BD4F
	for <coco@lists5.maltedmedia.com>; Wed, 25 May 2011 00:32:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (qmail 73275 invoked by uid 3002); 25 May 2011 04:32:15 -0000
Delivered-To: bathory-maltedmedia:com-coco@maltedmedia.com
Received: (qmail 73272 invoked from network); 25 May 2011 04:32:15 -0000
Received: from localhost.pair.com (HELO qs281.pair.com) (127.0.0.1)
	by localhost.pair.com with SMTP; 25 May 2011 04:32:15 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by qs281.pair.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 028F0D4C5A
	for <coco@maltedmedia.com>; Wed, 25 May 2011 00:32:15 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Check-By: qs281.pair.com
X-Spam-Check-By: qs281.pair.com
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=no version=3.002005
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Filtered: 2339d97e2cf80afbc3f9b452dd9fb067
Received: from mail.wdtv.com (mail.wdtv.com [66.118.69.84])
	by qs281.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65661D4C59
	for <coco@maltedmedia.com>; Wed, 25 May 2011 00:32:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (qmail 22231 invoked by uid 509); 25 May 2011 00:32:12 -0400
Received: from 204.111.67.78 (gheskett@wdtv.com@204.111.67.78) by
	mail.wdtv.com (envelope-from <gheskett@wdtv.com>,
	uid 508) with qmail-scanner-2.01 
	(clamdscan: 0.88.7/2478. spamassassin: 3.1.7.  
	Clear:RC:0(204.111.67.78):SA:0(-2.0/5.0):. 
	Processed in 2.984868 secs); 25 May 2011 04:32:12 -0000
Received: from n67s078.fttx.shentel.net (HELO coyote.coyote.den)
	(gheskett@wdtv.com@204.111.67.78)
	by mail.wdtv.com with SMTP; 25 May 2011 00:32:09 -0400
From: gene heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com>
To: coco@maltedmedia.com
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 00:32:09 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.38.7-pclos1.pae.bfs; KDE/4.6.3; i686; ; )
References: <20110524212513.GA6439@brawl.fslf.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110524212513.GA6439@brawl.fslf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <201105250032.09184.gheskett@wdtv.com>
Subject: Re: [Coco] cprep19 __FILE__ fix?
X-BeenThere: coco@maltedmedia.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts <coco@maltedmedia.com>
List-Id: CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts <coco.maltedmedia.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco>,
	<mailto:coco-request@maltedmedia.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://five.pairlist.net/pipermail/coco/>
List-Post: <mailto:coco@maltedmedia.com>
List-Help: <mailto:coco-request@maltedmedia.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco>,
	<mailto:coco-request@maltedmedia.com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: coco-bounces@maltedmedia.com
Errors-To: coco-bounces@maltedmedia.com
X-ELNK-Received-Info: spv=0;
X-ELNK-AV: 0
X-ELNK-Info: sbv=1; sbrc=-0; sbf=c0; sbw=000;

On Wednesday, May 25, 2011 12:14:02 AM Willard Goosey did opine:

> It was pretty easy to add quotes around the strings returned by
> __FILE__, __TIME__, and __DATE__.
> 
> Gene had fixed __FILE__ in cprep22, but not TIME or DATE.  I haven't
> migrated my fixes to cprep22 yet.
> 
> So, I'm not sure what's next.  Should I just send this stuff back to
> Gene and let him distribute it or what?
> 
> Willard

If you have fixes, by all means publish them by whatever means is best for 
you, Willard.  Yes, I worked on it some, enough to scratch my itch close to 
20 years ago now, but other than preaching that 19 blows the OEM version 
plumb into the next drainage, I don't consider it to be _my_ baby.

Frankly, I am surprised it hasn't needed its diaper changed long before 
now.

So with that, the "maintainer" flag for c.prep gets handed to Willard.  

OTOH, if you want to do those fixes, but don't have a handy server, smunch 
it up with ar2.0 or lha-2.0.x(whatever the last version was) (don't forget 
to update the README to reflect your work) and mail it back & I'll put it 
on my web page, which will be up till I fall over or they outlaw the 
internet.

Actually, duplication is insurance, so put a copy on maltedmedia too, that 
way if I get run over by a bus, its still available.

I am glad that someone is showing an interest in improving our C toolchain.

-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
<http://tinyurl.com/ddg5bz>
<http://www.cantrip.org/gatto.html>
Never get into fights with ugly people because they have nothing to lose.

--
Coco mailing list
Coco@maltedmedia.com
http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco